Each annotation must address the following critical elements: Explanation of the main purpose and scope of the cited work Brief description of the research conducted
Each annotation must address the following critical elements:
Explanation of the main purpose and scope of the cited work
Brief description of the research conducted
Value and significance of the work (e.g., study’s findings, scope of the research project) as a contribution to the subject under consideration
Possible shortcomings or bias in the work
Conclusions or observations reached by the author
Summary as to why this research lends evidence to support the potential problem identified specific to your role specialization.
1- Articles
1-
Graham, G. (2014). Population-based approaches to understanding disparities in cardiovascular disease risk in the United States. Int J Gen Med., 7(1), 393-400. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132228/
2-
Saab, K., Kendrick, J., Yracheta, J., & Lanaspa, M. (2015). New insights on the risk for cardiovascular disease in African Americans: The role of added sugars. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 26(2), 247-257. Retrieved from http://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/26/2/247.full
3-Sharma, A., Colvin-Adams, M., & Yancy, C. (2014). Heart failure in African Americans: Disparities can be overcome. Cleveland Clinical Journal of Medicine, 81(5), 301-311. Retrieved from http://www.abcardio.org/pdf/Yancy_Colvin.pdf